Advertisement
Journal of Oncology Practice  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search or Browse JOP Subscriptions PDA Services E-mail Alerts Customer Service

Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol 3, No 1 (January), 2007: pp. 2-8
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.0712001

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Table 5
Right arrow Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waldinger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waldinger, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Original Research

Benchmarks in Clinical Productivity: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network Survey

F. Marc Stewart, Robert L. Wasserman, Clara D. Bloomfield, Stephen Petersdorf, Robert P. Witherspoon, Frederick R. Appelbaum, Andrew Ziskind, Brian McKenna, Jennifer M. Dodson, Jane Weeks, William P. Vaughan, Barry Storer, Sara Perkel, Marcy Waldinger

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Comprehensive Cancer Center–Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital; Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Corresponding author: F. Marc Stewart, MD, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Mail Stop G4–810, Seattle, WA 98109, fstewart{at}seattlecca.org

PURPOSE: Oncologists in academic cancer centers usually generate professional fees that are insufficient to cover salaries and other expenses, despite significant clinical activity; therefore, supplemental funding is frequently required in order to support competitive levels of physician compensation. Relative value units (RVUs) allow comparisons of productivity across institutions and practice locations and provide a reasonable point of reference on which funding decisions can be based.

METHODS: We reviewed the clinical productivity and other characteristics of oncology physicians practicing in 13 major academic cancer institutions with membership or shared membership in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The objectives of this study were to develop tools that would lead to better-informed decision making regarding practice management and physician deployment in comprehensive cancer centers and to determine benchmarks of productivity using RVUs accrued by physicians at each institution. Three hundred fifty-three individual physician practices across the 13 NCCN institutions in the survey provided data describing adult hematology/medical oncology and bone marrow/stem-cell transplantation programs. Data from the member institutions participating in the survey included all American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes generated (billed) by each physician during each organization's fiscal year 2003 as a measure of actual clinical productivity. Physician characteristic data included specialty, clinical full-time equivalent (CFTE) status, faculty rank, faculty track, number of years of experience, and total salary by funding source. The average adult hematologist/medical oncologist in our sample would produce 3,745 RVUs if he/she worked full-time as a clinician (100% CFTE), compared with 4,506 RVUs for a 100% CFTE transplant oncologist.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Our results suggest specific clinical productivity targets for academic oncologists and provide a methodology for analyzing potential factors associated with clinical productivity and developing clinical productivity targets specific for physicians with a mix of research, administrative, teaching, and clinical salary support.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
D. W. Blayney
From Bench to Benchmarking
J. Oncol. Pract, January 1, 2007; 3(1): 1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JOP
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1935-469X. Print ISSN: 1554-7477
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JOP Online